Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Concept Removal Guidance: Evidence-Calibrated Negative Guidance for Safe Diffusion Sampling

Text-to-image diffusion models remain vulnerable to adversarial prompts that elicit disallowed content, motivating reliable inference-time controls. A popular approach is negative guidance, which subtracts a negative prompt direction with a fixed weight. However, it often forces a safety-fidelity trade-off, causing artifacts or prompt drift when over-applied and failing under attacks when under-applied. Dynamic variants reweight guidance using posterior-odds signals, which can be brittle for open-vocabulary compositional prompts, while lightweight similarity-based methods ignore the evolving image evidence along the denoising trajectory. We introduce Concept Removal Guidance (CRG), a trai...

AuthorsYoonseok Choi, Chaeyoung Oh, Hyunjun Choi et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published29 June 2026
Last updated at source29 June 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/aea3eef2-04da-47b3-985d-d9f8c98a9ee5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.