Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Sample Complexity of Scientific Discovery: PAC Learnability of Compositional Function Trees

Scientific discovery via symbolic regression is often viewed as statistically and computationally intractable because the hypothesis space of expressions grows combinatorially with depth. This paper revisits the statistical side through the lens of PAC learning, focusing on compositional function trees built from a finite vocabulary of smooth operators (e.g., $\{+,\times,\sin,\exp\}$ and affine maps). We prove that the relevant generalization quantity, Rademacher complexity, hence the excess risk, does not necessarily blow up exponentially with the number of distinct symbolic structures, but is controlled by (i) the depth $d$ and (ii) the Lipschitz constants of the base operators along th...

AuthorsŞuayp Talha Kocabay, Talha Rüzgar Akkuş, Kerem Yalçın
Primary categorycs.LG
Published28 June 2026
Last updated at source28 June 2026
cs.LGstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e6bcbfe7-0f02-4594-becb-880312758078" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.