Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Depth-Staggered Fibonacci Spacing for Sparse Attention: Static Schedules Beat Learned Dilation and Extrapolate Where Dense Attention Fails

We study sparse self-attention in which each query attends to a dense local window plus a set of Fibonacci-spaced offsets, with a per-layer scalar alpha that compresses or expands the spacing. Across 21 language models trained under one matched recipe (60M parameters, 512 hidden, 16 layers, 426M tokens), we compare four ways of setting alpha across depth: fixed, per-layer learned, a static linear stagger, and a coprime (anti-gridding) reassignment of that stagger, together with a reach-matched power-of-2 control. Three results stand out. First, a static per-layer stagger improves perplexity over both fixed and learned alpha, and the gain is base-agnostic: applying the same stagger to a po...

AuthorsChad A. Capps
Primary categorycs.CL
Published26 June 2026
Last updated at source26 June 2026
cs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d621924f-c566-461a-a981-9bd2f7714e53" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.