Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Benchmarking on Tasks That Matter: Dataset Selection for Preserving Model Rankings

Benchmarks of machine learning models often include many datasets, making evaluation expensive. For efficiency, it is preferable to perform evaluations on small, representative datasets instead. The selection of such subsets typically relies on heuristics and is rarely analyzed for the robustness of the resulting model rankings. We introduce a framework to perform the task of selecting datasets subsets with an evaluation of how different selection strategies preserve the global model rankings. Our framework includes bootstrap aggregation, which provides valid confidence intervals, allowing a principled comparison of selection strategies. We consider clustering, design criteria (A/D-optima...

AuthorsRostislav Gusev, Alexey Zaytsev
Primary categorycs.LG
Published26 June 2026
Last updated at source26 June 2026
cs.LGstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c0e95ef6-d2a3-4f0b-a0ad-9257f8d90356" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.