Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Paved with True Intents: Intent-Aware Training Improves LLM Safety Classification Across Training Regimes

We argue that safety classifiers should model user intent as an explicit signal between the prompt and the final label. To study this, we introduce AIMS, a human-annotated dataset of 1,724 difficult safety prompts, each paired with an intent description and harm label. We use AIMS to evaluate intent-aware training across supervised fine-tuning, preference learning, reasoning distillation, and reinforcement learning. Despite its size, AIMS enables competitive safety classifiers across training regimes: DPO from model-generated intent errors improves over SFT, and intent-conditioned distillation outperforms reasoning-only distillation in most teacher-student pairs. Most notably, directly re...

AuthorsJeremias Ferrao, Niclas Müller-Hof, Iustin Sîrbu et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published25 June 2026
Last updated at source25 June 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/92555bf4-73c9-4c11-84d6-8a67512f260e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.