Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Attributed, But Not Incremental: Cannibalization-Corrected Attribution for Large-Scale Advertising

In large-scale paid acquisition and growth advertising systems, production attribution outputs are widely used for daily budget allocation and channel diagnosis. However, paid-attributed conversions such as daily new users (DNU) may systematically overstate true incremental growth when paid channels overlap with organic demand, brand-driven traffic, or other acquisition channels. This attribution-cannibalization mismatch can distort incremental ROI measurement and budget decisions at scale. We propose an experiment-calibrated attribution correction framework that uses incrementality experiments as causal anchors to convert sparse lift measurements into daily correction estimates. To make ...

AuthorsDonghui Li, Bowen Yuan, Zili Yang et al.
Primary categorycs.IR
Published25 June 2026
Last updated at source25 June 2026
cs.IRcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b4bf86a6-b0be-43fa-9c21-e0ba90df6931" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.