Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

LLM Performance on a Real, Double-Marked GCSE Benchmark

We introduce a dataset of 32,534 double-marked real student responses to GCSE mock exams (GCSEs are the UK's national exams, taken at age ~16), spanning 328 questions across five subjects and including handwritten work. We test whether off-the-shelf large language models agree with examiners as closely as the two examiners agree with each other. We find that models overwhelmingly agree well with the examiner consensus across subjects, with the top performing models agreeing more closely with examiners than examiners agree with each other. Models achieve high scores for subjective tasks like English essay marking, as well as handling complex and messy handwritten Maths paper scripts. Agree...

AuthorsMalachy Fox, Kavi Samra, Paul Jung
Primary categorycs.CL
Published23 June 2026
Last updated at source23 June 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CYcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/90115613-a1ef-42a8-9e4b-9107aab0c892" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.