Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Towards Understanding the Power and Limits of the Muon Optimizer: A River-Valley Perspective

Recently, Muon has gained substantial attention as an appealing alternative to Adam-like optimizers, with many works highlighting its advantages through spectral normalization and improved conditioning. Yet this positive theoretical narrative contrasts with its empirical performance in large language model (LLM) training, where Muon's gains over Adam/AdamW are often mixed, schedule-sensitive, and not uniformly superior. To address this gap, we develop a trajectory-level theory characterizing both the strengths and limitations of Muon. We introduce a mixed-spiked matrix sensing model whose sensing operator decomposes into signal, spike, and bulk components, capturing a mixture of anisotrop...

AuthorsTianqi Shen, Jinji Yang, Runze Shi et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published19 June 2026
Last updated at source19 June 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fb7261f0-a10f-44b1-a456-4094808b4113" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.