Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Calibration Is Not Control: Intervention Value for LLM-Agent Oversight

Runtime oversight often intervenes when an LLM agent's calibrated failure score crosses a threshold. Yet states with the same failure risk can differ in whether intervention helps. Strictly increasing recalibration preserves the threshold policy class and cannot recover this distinction. We formalize when a summary is sufficient for intervention decisions and the utility lost when it is not. We evaluate the consequences by replaying agent prefixes and executing alternative actions from the same state. On ALFWorld, holding features, estimator, and router fixed while changing the supervision target from failure to intervention utility lowers regret from 0.51 to 0.09; the gain replicates on ...

AuthorsChubin Zhang, Zhenglin Wan, Xingrui Yu et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published19 June 2026
Last updated at source6 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c7e985cd-682b-495e-a758-26cf6209af8e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.