Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Equilibrium with Internal Transfers

Nash equilibrium (NE) arises from selfish utility maximization, yet its social welfare can be arbitrarily far from optimal. Moreover, computing an NE is intractable in general. We study augmented game models in which players use budget-balanced internal transfers to improve incentives before play. We first introduce \emph{Self-Enforcing Transfer Equilibrium} (SETE), where players commit to nonnegative peer-to-peer transfers that are paid only if the recipient does not deviate from a prescribed strategy. For polymatrix games, we show that every stationary point of the social welfare function, in particular any socially optimal strategy profile, can be sustained as a SETE. This induces a Na...

AuthorsMingyang Liu, Gabriele Farina, Asuman Ozdaglar
Primary categorycs.GT
Published18 June 2026
Last updated at source18 June 2026
cs.GTcs.LGecon.TH
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b29e9b47-c1db-46b4-90fd-58f437fee020" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.