Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Understanding Latent Flow Models for Tabular Data Synthesis: Targets, Paths, and Sampling

Synthetic tabular data enables microdata sharing in regulated domains, yet deploying continuous-time generative models requires balancing analytical utility, disclosure risk, and computational cost. Latent-space flow models are flexible, but theoretical equivalences across learning targets, probability paths, and sampling dynamics can translate into different behaviour under finite-step integration and explicit compute budgets. We present an empirical study of tabular latent flow models across seven datasets, evaluating velocity, score, noise, and posterior matching objectives under optimal transport (OT) and variance-preserving (VP) paths, ODE and SDE sampling, and varying integration bu...

AuthorsBahrul Ilmi Nasution
Primary categorycs.LG
Published18 June 2026
Last updated at source18 June 2026
cs.LGstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f996c874-ef7b-4e9c-b096-d2c17df3d938" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.