Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Using Biometrics to Understand AI-Assisted Coding Performance and its Perception

AI-based code assistants are transforming software development, yet we lack empirical evidence on how they affect developers' cognitive processes. We present a multisite study investigating the neurophysiological correlates of AI-assisted programming through a within-subjects crossover design. We recruited participants at two universities (Bari, Italy, and Copenhagen, Denmark) and collected electroencephalography, eye-tracking, electrodermal activity, and heart rate variability data alongside a rubric-based performance score and self-reported workload across six dimensions using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). We tested four hypotheses addressing physiological differences between AI-...

AuthorsPaolo Burelli, Fabio Calefato, Daniela Grassi et al.
Primary categorycs.HC
Published19 May 2026
Last updated at source19 May 2026
cs.HCcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/df8bde0c-0cb9-49c2-8ed5-49358e26eb8b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.