Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Training-Free Metrics for Synthetic Object Detection Data: A Proxy for Detector Performance

Synthetic images are increasingly used to augment scarce real data for object detection. However, not all synthetic sets help equally, and the only way to know a set's value is to train a detector on it, which is slow and demands dense annotation. We ask whether a training-free metric can instead rank candidate synthetic training sets by their downstream utility. Existing image-set metrics such as FID, KID, and MMD compare two feature distributions with a single global statistic, which we show is mis-specified for detection-data selection in two ways: it is blind to per-image composition (object count, box scale, class mix), and even at fixed composition its global averaging washes out th...

AuthorsMyeongseok Nam, Donghun Yeo, Seungwook Kim
Primary categorycs.CV
Published18 June 2026
Last updated at source16 July 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b637ddc3-70b6-4747-9c92-f3ec7ead8c58" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.