Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Your AI Travel Agent Would Book You a Bullfight: An Agentic Benchmark for Implicit Animal Welfare in Frontier AI Models

Previous research has evaluated animal welfare using question-and-answer benchmarks. This study investigates whether these evaluations also hold in agentic settings. The agents may showcase different behaviors compared to stand-alone large language models, as demonstrated in prior studies. This work introduces \textit{TAC (Travel Agent Compassion)}: the first agentic benchmark for assessing animal exploitation. TAC evaluates AI agentic behavior in travel booking scenarios across six animal categories, using thirteen hand-authored scenarios that vary by price, rating, and position, expanded via four augmentation variants into $52$ prompts and run for three epochs, giving $156$ scored obser...

AuthorsJasmine Brazilek, Joel Christoph, Maheep Chaudhary et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published16 June 2026
Last updated at source6 July 2026
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/1d8867a0-7b78-4e5d-a252-545ce8806d97" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Connected in the knowledge graph

Explore this entry in the graph

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.