Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A Machine-Learned Comorbidity Index

Traditional comorbidity scores (e.g., Charlson and Elixhauser) are widely used for risk adjustment and patient stratification, but they have two key limitations: (i) they are largely mortality-centric and do not align well with other clinical outcomes, and (ii) their linear, rule-based structure cannot capture nonlinear, outcome-specific risk relationships. We propose a Machine-Learned Comorbidity Index (MLCI) that maps diagnosis codes to a single scalar by maximizing the normalized Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (nHSIC) between the learned score and multiple clinical outcomes. MLCI captures nonlinear risk-outcome dependence and is supported by a theory that characterizes when a u...

AuthorsSuleman Baloch, Kishlay Jha, Alberto M. Segre et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published16 June 2026
Last updated at source17 August 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f958cc2f-05af-4eb3-bba9-19ba51fa4640" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.