Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

How Post-Training Shapes Biological Reasoning Models

Scientific reasoning models for biology combine language models with foundation models trained on multimodal biological data, including DNA, RNA, and proteins. These models are built through post-training, yet how each stage shapes reasoning and generalization remains poorly understood. We study when post-training improves performance and when it induces over-specialization. Across genomics, transcriptomics, and proteins, we train and evaluate more than 100 biological reasoning models under controlled variation in backbone, continued pre-training (CPT), supervised fine-tuning (SFT), and reinforcement learning (RL), measuring both in-domain (ID) and out-of-domain (OOD) performance. We find...

AuthorsLukas Fesser, Hanlin Zhang, Michelle M. Li et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published15 June 2026
Last updated at source30 June 2026
cs.LGq-bio.QM
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ab67b259-e681-4519-bcaa-982521608d2b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.