Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Scaling Human and G2P Supervision for Robust Phonetic Transcription

Expert phonetic annotation is costly, especially for non-standard dialects and atypical speech. A common alternative is using Grapheme-to-Phoneme (G2P) models to auto-generate phonetic labels from text transcripts at scale. We study how automatic phonetic transcription performance scales with human and G2P supervision in English. Using a curated 80-hour benchmark spanning native, non-native and post-stroke speech, we identify a supervision quality threshold: G2P supervision helps only when fewer than 20-30 hours of human annotation are available. Beyond this threshold, it provides no significant benefit and can reduce cross-dialect robustness. What is effective after this threshold is ASR...

AuthorsAlexander Metzger, Aruna Srivastava, Ruslan Mukhamedvaleev
Primary categorycs.CL
Published14 June 2026
Last updated at source14 June 2026
cs.CLcs.LGcs.SD
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/06d072ba-57d9-4e0a-a80a-d837dfc202cd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Popularity, last 4 days

0 now. Counts as reported by the source, snapshotted daily by Silytics.

Connected in the knowledge graph

Explore this entry in the graph

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 20 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.