Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

One Goal, Many Commands: Characterizing Denylist Fragility in AI Agents

The adoption of AI agents is increasing rapidly. Terminal AI agents, i.e., AI agents that run in terminal environments, are a widely used type of AI agents. Terminal AI agents rely heavily on shell command execution to interact with the host systems. They adopt a three-list command-gating mechanism to mitigate security risks introduced by command execution, with denylists serving as the load-bearing component. However, modern operating systems often ship a large, ever-expanding set of shell commands with complex functionalities. Our observation is that even a built-in denylist of Claude Code, well-maintained by its developers, can overlook bypass commands that invalidate its effectiveness...

AuthorsChuyang Chen, Zhiqiang Lin
Primary categorycs.CR
Published14 June 2026
Last updated at source20 June 2026
cs.CRcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9e4be686-45d0-42d3-b7fb-f0e7b09952f6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.