Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Physics-Grounded Causal Auditing of End-to-End Driving Planners

End-to-end (E2E) autonomous-driving planners trained by imitation are prone to statistical shortcuts: they associate scene elements that merely co-occur with expert actions (a roadside object, a building facade) with driving decisions, rather than the variables that causally determine them. Such causal confusion silently compromises reliability in long-tail scenarios, and it is difficult to detect, because prevailing open-loop metrics (L2 displacement and collision rate) are dominated by ego status and do not indicate whether a planner depends on spurious cues. Existing remedies based on causal-intervention training require retraining large models and cannot audit a planner that is alread...

AuthorsZikun Guo, Minglan Chen, Jinyou Zhai et al.
Primary categorycs.RO
Published12 June 2026
Last updated at source18 August 2026
cs.ROcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8878c0d1-1eb2-40bd-8f0e-f25a09443898" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.