Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Exposure Bias as Epistemic Underidentification in Recursive Forecasting

Recursive multi-step forecasting is usually framed as distribution shift: models are trained on observed histories but deployed on their own predictions. We show this framing is incomplete by proving that, under partial observability or state truncation, recursive rollout is also an epistemic underidentification problem. Even with deterministic latent dynamics, one-step Bayes supervision identifies behavior only on observed contexts and need not identify the deployed recursive predictor once rollout queries self-generated induced states whose correct local targets are not determined by numeric state alone. We formalize this with induced states $Z$ and provenance variables $P$, and derive ...

AuthorsRiku Green, Zahraa S. Abdallah, Telmo M Silva Filho
Primary categorycs.LG
Published11 June 2026
Last updated at source11 June 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ffded16e-adcd-425f-8aed-1f2b580a8fec" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.