Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Smarter Saboteurs, Better Fixers: Scaling & Security in Linear Multi-Agent Workflows

As LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) are deployed in the wild, the resilience of their collaboration structures against adversarial compromise becomes a critical safety concern. Attackers may leverage prompt-injection or jailbreaking to sabotage individual agents within MAS workflows, but the interaction between model scaling and system-level resilience remains poorly understood. This paper investigates how model scale affects the security of linear multi-agent workflows. Our experiments across scales of two open-weight model families on the HumanEval benchmark reveal a compliance-correction symmetry: larger models are far more likely to faithfully execute malicious instructions, with t...

AuthorsTimothy McAllister, Sina Abdidizaji, Ivan Garibay et al.
Primary categorycs.MA
Published10 June 2026
Last updated at source10 June 2026
cs.MAcs.CRcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/de3ac214-2ff6-4188-b3bd-2dec46ef5135" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.