Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Provenance-Grounded Gating and Adaptive Recovery in Synthetic Post-Training Data Curation

Synthetic post-training pipelines commonly filter generated samples with reward models or holistic LLM judges, yet two practices remain rarely examined together: whether the filtering signal is grounded in the source evidence that induced each generation, and whether rejected samples can be systematically recovered rather than permanently discarded. We present a controlled study of both questions across gate configurations, recovery strategies, and generator scales, using adversarially injected corpora to provide ground-truth failure labels. We find that exact source provenance improves faithfulness gating for stronger judges, that hallucination and reward gates reject largely disjoint sa...

AuthorsSoham Bhattacharjee, Karun Sharma, Vinay Kumar Sankarapu et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published9 June 2026
Last updated at source9 June 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7847f09b-7cfb-46c2-ace1-8868bcc6b56e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.