Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

PhysMetrics.Weather: An Evaluation Framework for Physical Consistency in ML Weather Models

Machine learning weather prediction (MLWP) models have achieved impressive forecasting performance at a small fraction of the computational costs required for traditional physics-based methods. However, they are primarily (1) data-driven and (2) evaluated using pixel-wide error metrics (e.g., RMSE), so there are no guarantees that their forecasts are consistent with known physical laws. We introduce PhysMetrics$.$Weather, an evaluation framework that assesses the physical realism of MLWP models across three types of metrics: conservation, spectral, and dynamical. By quantifying physical realism, this tool guides the development of physics-informed architectures and helps evaluate whether ...

AuthorsEmma Kasteleyn, Timo Maier, Axel Lauer et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published9 June 2026
Last updated at source11 June 2026
cs.LGphysics.ao-ph
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/dd5e6555-f84e-4e32-bf89-521feba559f6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.