Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Is Fairness Truly Fair? Towards Reliable Lipschitz Fairness in Multi-Task Learning via Fixed-\texorpdfstring{$δ$}{delta} Alignment

Lipschitz-style individual fairness formalizes the idea that semantically similar examples should receive similar predictions, but its evaluation in multi-task learning (MTL) can be confounded by method-induced representation scales. This paper identifies threshold confounding: when the auditing tolerance is derived from each model's own representation distances, different algorithms are compared under different semantic thresholds. A threshold-drift analysis further shows how Bias rankings can change and identifies sufficient conditions for ranking preservation. We propose \textbf{ReLiF}, a reliability-aware framework that separates evaluation-time fixed-$δ$ auditing from training-time c...

AuthorsJunbo Ding, Xin Zang, Chenchen Pan et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published9 June 2026
Last updated at source9 June 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7655171b-75d6-4f8b-8a4e-4357711e6de3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.