Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Selection, Not Salience: The Shape and Limits of Personalization in Social Highlighting

Does personalizing what a reader sees pay off, and where does it stop? Using a social web highlighter and a co-readership identity control (the same document highlighted by many users, which holds document and topic fixed and asks whether a person's own history predicts their marks better than another reader's does), we map the shape and limits of personalization across reading altitudes. At the document altitude we give the clean, leakage-free, identity-controlled measurement that prior next-document evaluations could only upper-bound: a person's history identifies which documents in a co-reading neighborhood are theirs, with an own-versus-other gap of +0.169 against community negatives ...

AuthorsKazuki Nakayashiki, Keisuke Watanabe
Primary categorycs.IR
Published9 June 2026
Last updated at source9 June 2026
cs.IRcs.CLcs.HCcs.SI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/834c43ad-b41e-47c4-81b3-21ea6a0f9ed7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.