Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Can Data Work be Reparative?

We present an ethnographic study of an alternative approach to data work, developed by a civic-tech initiative that builds datasets for training and benchmarking online safety systems. They aim to respond to online safety concerns from a feminist perspective, by building safety datasets collaboratively with those most impacted by online harms. In this paper, we examine how this approach aims to reorient data work as a site for repair and redress, and trace the struggles they encounter in the process. Specifically, we draw attention to the challenges and tensions involved in advancing just reward for data work and collective governance of AI datasets. Examining these challenges through an ...

AuthorsSrravya Chandhiramowuli, Ding Wang, Alex Taylor
Primary categorycs.CY
Published8 June 2026
Last updated at source8 June 2026
cs.CYcs.AIcs.HC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b923346d-8b6a-49d0-a5af-f1ca2a497c13" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.