Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Reliable to Expressive: A Curriculum for Rubric-Following Safety Judges

Safety judges are increasingly deployed to evaluate model outputs against evolving criteria, yet recent meta-evaluation work shows they remain brittle under prompt and rubric variation, with false negative-rate swings of up to 0.24 reported for stylistic perturbations alone. We argue that safety judgment is fundamentally a rubric-following problem: a robust judge must apply the given evaluation criteria consistently across rubric formulations rather than memorize one specific template. We propose a training strategy that combines (i) instance-conditioned dynamic rubrics generated from prompt-response-label triples to expose the judge to the variability of evaluation criteria, and (ii) a r...

AuthorsYongtaek Lim, Hyeji Choi, Minwoo Kim
Primary categorycs.AI
Published8 June 2026
Last updated at source8 June 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f6e532be-1683-4d13-afc9-5710ebc49c40" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.