Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Rank Intervals for Leaderboards: A Hierarchical Framework for Model Evaluation

Pretrained models are often evaluated on multi-task leaderboards to measure their applicability in diverse contexts. However, current methods for aggregating performance across tasks into leaderboard-level rankings do not address the uncertainty and variability at the task level. While recent works have proposed interval-based model rankings, the principled aggregation of uncertainty from individual tasks to leaderboard-level rankings remains unaddressed, and variation in models' performance across tasks is frequently obscured. In this work, we introduce a hierarchical framework that constructs model rank intervals with statistical guarantees at both levels: task-level rank confidence int...

AuthorsBitya Neuhof, Yuval Benjamini
Primary categorystat.ML
Published7 June 2026
Last updated at source7 June 2026
stat.MLcs.CLcs.LGstat.ME
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d73310a4-3b3e-477c-8807-3319fe07f3be" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.