Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Constrained Paraphrase Consistency for LLM Hallucination Detection

Large language models (LLMs) can generate factually inconsistent claims, motivating accurate and scalable hallucination detectors. Prior work largely enlarges training sets via synthesis or new annotations, introducing increasing cost and potential bias while underusing the consistency implied by semantically equivalent paraphrases. We propose Consistency-Constrained Hallucination Detector (CCHD), which formulates training as a constrained optimization problem. The standard cross-entropy on original document-claim pairs is complemented by (i) paraphrase-consistency constraints bounding divergence across paraphrased views, and (ii) label-preservation constraints tying paraphrases to ground...

AuthorsShanshan Lin, Dongsheng Hong, Sibo Ju et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published6 June 2026
Last updated at source6 June 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/75bc2f11-a326-4ef8-9fab-5138f63da6ab" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.