Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Differences in Detection: Explainability Where it Matters

We propose Differences in Detection (DnD), an intuitive method to compare two object detection models. Based on the same matching algorithm, it complements the standard metrics of mean Average Precision ($mAP$) and TIDE error analysis with the ability to compare two models directly. More specifically, we calculate the intersection of ground truth labels that are recognized by both models, followed by the corresponding difference sets and the complement set of ground truth labels that are missed by both models. The resulting comparison is more direct and intuitive than a comparison of independent summary statistics. It reveals individual and shared mistakes and becomes particularly interes...

AuthorsJohannes Theodoridis, Johannes Maucher, Andreas Schilling
Primary categorycs.CV
Published5 June 2026
Last updated at source5 June 2026
cs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/cc27cae5-2026-42ca-8588-ded47a605a0c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.