Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Measuring the sensitivity of LLM-based structured extraction to prompt, model, and schema choices in clinical discharge summaries

Large language models are increasingly used for structured extraction from clinical free-text notes, but the sensitivity of their output to upstream configuration choices is less understood than their accuracy on fixed benchmarks. This work measures that sensitivity without human-annotated ground truth, by holding the extraction task fixed and varying one choice at a time. The fixed schema comprises 17 clinical documentation flags on a three-way yes/no/not_documented value set and a 47-tag vocabulary for the primary admission reason. Three prompt variants expressing this schema were each run at two model sizes on MIMIC-IV v3.1 discharge summaries. Cross-prompt agreement was measured by Co...

AuthorsMartin Murin
Primary categorycs.CL
Published4 June 2026
Last updated at source4 June 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f16df17c-f768-4346-a89d-27fc6d245de1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.