Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Not All Errors Are Equal: Consequence-Aware Reasoning Compute Allocation

Test-time compute has emerged as an effective paradigm for improving large language model capability at inference time. Existing allocation strategies primarily prioritize tasks according to difficulty, uncertainty, or expected performance gain, implicitly treating prediction errors as equally costly. This assumption is often misaligned with real deployment, where failures can differ substantially in their downstream tasks. To address this limitation, this paper introduces consequence-aware test-time compute allocation by formulating a cost-weighted scheduling problem where the priority of a task is its failure consequence with the marginal gain of additional compute. In practice, however...

AuthorsLiang He, Jingbo Wen, Haoyu Wang et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published3 June 2026
Last updated at source1 October 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fc549408-56cc-4694-9f5a-a2face1c5b05" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.