Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

MAdam: Metric-Aware Multi-Objective Adam

Multi-objective optimization (MOO) underlies many machine learning problems, yet MOO solvers across the loss-balancing, gradient-balancing, and Pareto-based families almost universally hand their reconciled directions to Adam~\citep{kingma2015adam}. We show this coupling introduces two systematic gaps between the solver's intent and the optimizer's execution. The first is a weighting mismatch: Adam's second-moment denominator entangles the time-varying preference vector with gradient statistics, marginalizing the preference into a history average and collapsing distinct Pareto trade-offs toward a near-uniform mixture. The second is a geometric mismatch: Adam's adaptive metric distorts the...

AuthorsFengbei Liu, Rachit Saluja, Sunwoo Kwak et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published2 June 2026
Last updated at source6 October 2026
cs.LGcs.CV
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8650d588-06eb-486b-9810-188b119e6d2f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.