Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

SAGE: A Quantitative Evaluation of Socialized Evolution in Agent Ecosystems

Self-improving language agents are typically evaluated in isolation: an agent attempts a task, receives feedback, and iteratively refines its own behavior. Yet agents increasingly operate alongside peers whose strategies and outcomes are publicly visible. This raises an under-studied question: when does shared experience produce improvements that self-improvement alone cannot achieve? We introduce SAGE (Social Agent Group Evolution),an evaluation framework that compares two compute-matched conditions: SocialEvo, where agents from five distinct model families co-evolve with access to all peers' histories; and SelfEvo, where each agent receives the same number of task attempts but sees only...

AuthorsLinyue Pan, Yaoming Zhu, Lin Qiu et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published2 June 2026
Last updated at source2 June 2026
cs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fe03be43-b47c-476e-9de5-5db0adc75ebb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.