What Makes Interaction Trajectories Effective for Training Terminal Agents?
Stronger code agents are commonly assumed to be superior teachers for post-training, yet this assumption remains poorly disentangled from task difficulty, harness design, and student capacity. We investigate this pedagogical link using Terminal-Lego, a scalable pipeline that transforms multi-domain real-world issues into environment-verified agentic tasks. Surprisingly, standalone performance does not dictate teaching efficacy: while Claude Opus 4.6 achieves higher scores on Terminal-Bench 2.0, students fine-tuned on trajectories from DeepSeek-V3.2, a lower-scoring agent, exhibit significantly stronger generalization. We attribute this "pedagogical paradox" to Environment-Grounded Supervi...
| Authors | Sidi Yang, Chaofan Tao, Jierun Chen et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.AI |
| Published | 2 June 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 2 June 2026 |
Connected in the knowledge graph
- Lego-X/Terminal-Lego-15kDataset · cited by
- PrimeIntellect/Terminal-Lego-15kDataset · cited by
Models and datasets referencing this paper
- PrimeIntellect/Terminal-Lego-15kDataset
- Lego-X/Terminal-Lego-15kDataset
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.