Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Learning to Solve, Forgetting to Retain: Correct-Set Turnover in RLVR

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves the ability of large language model, yet headline accuracy gains often conceal a hidden cost: previously solved problems quietly become unsolvable as training proceeds. We frame this phenomenon as \emph{correct-set turnover}, representing the coupled dynamics of solution acquisition and regression over the mastered set. Under this view, retention becomes an explicit optimization target alongside acquisition. We analytically and empirically establish the \emph{repair-window principle}: the cost of restoring a regressed prompt grows sharply with review delay, defining a low-cost window that standard RLVR pipelines fail to exploi...

AuthorsChuanyu Qin, Chenxu Yang, Qingyi Si et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published2 June 2026
Last updated at source29 September 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e1bed5d5-642b-4d9d-a966-d8548b821850" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.