Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

SPADE-Bench: Evaluating Spontaneous Strategic Deception in Agents via Plan-Action Divergence

As LLM-based agents expand their operational scope, reliability becomes a prerequisite for real-world deployment. However, in practical applications, human users cannot monitor every immediate behavior; instead, the execution process often remains a black box, leaving users dependent solely on the agent's self-reported updates. This opacity creates a critical risk: agents may present observer-facing reports that diverge from their executed actions, rendering the system uncontrollable, especially in high-stakes autonomous scenarios. We term such self-reported plan-action divergence as agent deception. To assess this, we introduce SPADE-Bench, a benchmark designed to evaluate spontaneous pl...

AuthorsYuyan Bu, Haowei Li, Qirui Zheng et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published1 June 2026
Last updated at source28 June 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/711bea81-292d-47ab-8dfb-8587a04a9124" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.