Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Consistency evaluation of benchmarks used for causal discovery

In graphical causal model, causal discovery aims to construct a causal graph based on numerical data and domain knowledge in plain text. However, the evaluation of causal discovery methods remains a challenge in the area as the progress of domain researches often makes benchmark causal graphs contain mis-aligned knowledge. This problem especially affects the evaluation of large language model (LLM) based causal discovery methods as they are sensitive to the new discoveries in the literature. This work is the first to systematically study the quality of benchmark causal graphs. Specifically, we design a pipeline that automatically retrieves relevant research papers from scientific database...

AuthorsYuzhe Zhang, Chihui Chen, Lina Yao et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published1 June 2026
Last updated at source1 June 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e3c9c88a-4569-4004-95d8-20ff16e64dcd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.