Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Graph Neural Networks Are Not Continuous Across Graph Resolutions

We show that contrary to conventional wisdom in the community, graph neural networks (GNNs) are not continuous with respect to all natural modes of graph convergence. As a result, GNNs may generate substantially different latent representations for graphs that are very similar. In particular they assign vastly different latent embeddings to graphs that represent the same underlying object at different resolution scales. We trace this failure of continuity back to a structural obstruction arising from commonly used information-propagation schemes. Building on this insight we then derive a principled modification to standard GNN architectures which equips models with continuity across scale...

AuthorsChristian Koke, Yuesong Shen, Abhishek Saroha et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published29 May 2026
Last updated at source29 May 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9465a3a6-ef6b-4d7d-b999-6bed984ba962" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.