Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Benchmarking Machine Learning Uncertainty Quantification Methodologies for Predicting Turbine Gas Temperature Degradation

Effective prognostics and health management of modern engines relies on accurate turbine gas temperature predictions and robust uncertainty quantification to ensure reliability and safety. This paper investigates five major approaches for constructing prediction intervals -- namely the Delta method, Bayesian Monte Carlo Dropout, Bootstrap method, Lower-Upper Bound Estimation, and Mean-Variance Estimation -- as a means of capturing the uncertainty in neural network predictions of turbine gas temperature. Each approach is implemented within a unified experimental framework that employs cross-validation for hyperparameter selection, repeated train-test splits for performance robustness, and ...

AuthorsJostein Barry-Straume, Changmin Son, Adrian Sandu et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published28 May 2026
Last updated at source28 May 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CE
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/cff445a8-5579-4795-8c0d-4d9a5e4048c2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.