Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

On the Optimizer Dependence of Neural Scaling Laws

The scaling exponent $α$ in neural scaling laws $L(N) \propto N^{-α}$ is commonly treated as a fixed constant set by architecture and data. We present evidence that $α$ depends systematically on the optimizer. In controlled random-feature regression experiments -- the canonical theoretical framework for neural scaling -- we measure $α$ across five optimizer variants and six spectral conditions. Preconditioned optimizers consistently yield steeper scaling (larger $α$), with the $α$-shift increasing across most of the tested spectral range, peaking near $s = 1.5$, and remaining large at $s = 2.0$. At $s \approx 1.0$ (characteristic of natural language), the full natural gradient achieves $α...

AuthorsVansh Ramani, Shourya Vir Jain
Primary categorycs.LG
Published28 May 2026
Last updated at source28 May 2026
cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8c37d1a6-57e7-4f83-989b-5f0d5a1d119c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.