Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Analyzing Quality-Latency-Resource Trade-offs in a Technical Documentation RAG Assistant Using LoRA Adaptation

We study quality-latency-resource trade-offs in a documentation-grounded retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) system that uses Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) of the generator. We build a manually verified benchmark of 5,144 question-answer pairs over the official Kubernetes documentation and combine it with a fixed hybrid-retrieval pipeline (BGE-M3 dense, BGE-M3 native sparse, Reciprocal Rank Fusion, cross-encoder reranking). Over this benchmark we ablate 20 LoRA configurations on Llama-3.2-3B-Instruct and Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct across rank and target-module choices, and evaluate each on token-level F1, LLM-judged groundedness and correctness (pass@4), inference latency, inference memory, and ...

AuthorsEvgenii Palnikov, Elizaveta Gavrilova
Primary categorycs.CL
Published27 May 2026
Last updated at source27 May 2026
cs.CLcs.IRcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a1302c9f-003d-4ef5-9bd0-08f66186af0f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.