Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Future of Facts: Tracing the Factual Generation-Verification Gap

Language models are becoming the default interface to factual knowledge, yet they often verify outputs more reliably than they generate them. This generation-verification gap (GV-gap) underlies many recent advances in self-improvement and reasoning, but its dynamics on factual knowledge specifically remain poorly understood. We focus on the training mechanisms underlying factual GV-gaps, distinguishing them from their computational and aesthetic counterparts. We trace generation and verification capabilities through three training phases (acquisition, continual learning, and updating) across four open-source model families at two scales each. Three findings recur across models: (i) verifi...

AuthorsTim R. Davidson, Anja Surina, Caglar Gulcehre
Primary categorycs.CL
Published26 May 2026
Last updated at source26 May 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/c53fff86-7176-4adf-9efe-39aa2028e824" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.