Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Rethinking Weak Supervision in Anomaly Detection: A Comprehensive Benchmark

Weakly supervised anomaly detection (WSAD) has developed in three primary directions: incomplete, inexact, and inaccurate supervision. However, these directions remain isolated, lacking a unified framework to assess whether they address unique challenges or share fundamental mechanisms. This paper introduces WSADBench, the first benchmark that unifies evaluation across distinct weakly supervised scenarios, benchmarking diverse approaches from specialized WSAD methods to advanced tabular foundation models. WSADBench establishes standardized protocols to evaluate 36 algorithms across 4 modalities by systematically varying label quantity, granularity, and quality, revealing the performance b...

AuthorsXu Yao, Siyuan Zhou, Zhenbo Wu et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published25 May 2026
Last updated at source30 May 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/745580ad-f106-4b83-9a0e-e397d325ab08" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.