Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

AI-Assisted Systematization for Evaluating GenAI Systems

Evaluating generative AI (GenAI) systems is challenging because many targets of evaluation are broad, contested concepts, such as "reasoning," "fairness," or "creativity." When these concepts are left underspecified, it becomes unclear what should be measured or how evaluation results should be interpreted. This problem reflects a missing step: systematization, that is, moving from a broad background concept to an explicit, structured account of the concept in measurable terms. To help address the fact that systematization is cognitively demanding and resource-intensive, we investigate whether AI assistance can support this process. To enable AI-assisted systematization and assess its qua...

AuthorsDhruv Agarwal, Emily Sheng, Chad Atalla et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published25 May 2026
Last updated at source25 May 2026
cs.CLcs.AIcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f8bfe254-bdb8-49a7-b6f7-051ddba8f902" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.