Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Simulating Human Memory with Language Models

Language models are increasingly being deployed as user simulators, but their memory is far more reliable than that of real users. To measure this gap, we run a series of classic memory experiments from psychology on both humans and language models. Across tasks, we find that out-of-the-box language models exhibit better memory than humans, even when prompted to imitate human behavior. We then show that better prompting strategies and the use of a compactor can cause language models to forget content in a more human-like way. Using these methods, we show preliminary evidence that language models with human-like memory constraints can function as more effective user simulators in a downstr...

AuthorsQihan Wang, Nicholas Tomlin, Michael Hu et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published25 May 2026
Last updated at source25 May 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8df203b6-78be-4524-893e-c8bd785f6bd3" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.