Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests

As AI agents increasingly contribute to code development and maintenance, there is still limited empirical evidence on the quality and risk characteristics of their changes in real-world projects, particularly for refactoring-oriented contributions. It remains unclear how agent-authored refactoring edits affect maintainability, code quality, and security once merged into GitHub repositories. To address this gap, we conduct an empirical study of Python refactoring pull requests (PRs) from the AIDev dataset. We analyze agentic refactoring PRs using PyQu, an ML-based quality assessment tool for Python, to quantify changes across five quality attributes, and we complement PyQu with domain-ind...

AuthorsMohamed Almukhtar, Anwar Ghammam, Hua Ming
Primary categorycs.SE
Published20 May 2026
Last updated at source20 May 2026
cs.SEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f94d5447-bfb0-4f67-8348-038f5153fbf2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.