Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Stimulus symmetries can confound representational similarity analyses

What can representational similarity matrices (RSMs) tell us about a neural code? As the popularity of these summary statistics grows, so too does the need for a more complete characterization of their properties. Here, we show that symmetries in network inputs can confound RSM-based analyses. Stimulus symmetries render many representations functionally equivalent, but these different configurations can lead to different RSMs. These different RSMs reflect qualitatively different representational geometries, ranging from disentangled to maximally-mixed codes. We show that stochastic gradient descent or energetic regularization can generate sparse, drifting codes, leading in turn to driftin...

AuthorsFarhad Pashakhanloo, Jacob A. Zavatone-Veth
Primary categoryq-bio.NC
Published20 May 2026
Last updated at source2 October 2026
q-bio.NCcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9fa71ee2-7389-4252-b5e2-7faf4aad11c8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.