Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Fake Image Detection

The growing sophistication of GAN-based image manipulation presents significant challenges for digital forensics. This study compares the performance of four pretrained CNN architectures including VGG16, ResNet50, EfficientNetB0, and XceptionNet for fake image detection using a unified preprocessing and training pipeline. A dataset of real and manipulated images was processed through resizing, normalization, and augmentation to address class imbalance and improve generalization. Models were evaluated using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. VGG16 achieved the highest accuracy at 91%, with XceptionNet, ResNet50, and EfficientNetB0 each reaching 90%. EfficientNetB0 showed s...

AuthorsAkhitha Pakala, Mohammed Mahir Rahman, Shahzad Memon et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published20 May 2026
Last updated at source20 May 2026
cs.CVcs.AIcs.CR
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b7e0cd51-8629-46b6-aa14-7e28e9c02db6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.