Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Do Better Volatility Forecasts Lead to Better Portfolios? Evidence from Graph Neural Networks

This paper tests whether graph neural networks improve realized volatility forecasts and whether those forecasts improve portfolio performance. Using weekly realized volatility for 465 S&P 500 equities from 2015-2025, Heterogeneous Autoregressive and Long Short-Term Memory baselines are compared against GraphSAGE models built on rolling correlation, sector, and Granger-causal graphs, with and without macro regime features. The empirical finding is that the model with the lowest forecast MSE, the model with the highest cross-sectional ranking accuracy, and the model with the highest portfolio Sharpe ratio are three different models. Forecast accuracy, ranking quality, and portfolio perform...

AuthorsRylan Wade
Primary categoryq-fin.PM
Published19 May 2026
Last updated at source20 May 2026
q-fin.PMcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/71e9e543-8ffc-4305-8295-2251ec8a0eb7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.